CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY · 8 MIN READ
Bayes’ theorem explained with a probability table
Bayes’ theorem updates a probability when you learn new evidence. The common trap is ignoring how rare the event was before the evidence arrived.
The quick answer
Bayes’ theorem tells you how likely a hypothesis is after some evidence, given how likely the evidence would be under competing possibilities:
P(A | B) = P(B | A) × P(A) / P(B)
Here, A is the event we care about and B is the observed evidence. The denominator P(B) includes all ways that evidence can occur, not only the way involving event A.
A concrete example: screening 10,000 items
Imagine a fictional quality-control system: 1% of manufactured items are defective. A test catches 95% of defective items, but also incorrectly flags 10% of non-defective items. If an item is flagged, what is the probability it is actually defective?
Use a group of 10,000 items to make the base rates visible.
| Actual status | Flagged | Not flagged | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defective | 95 | 5 | 100 |
| Not defective | 990 | 8,910 | 9,900 |
| Total | 1,085 | 8,915 | 10,000 |
The test flagged 1,085 items in total. Only 95 of those were actually defective. Consequently:
P(defective | flagged) = 95 / 1,085 = about 8.76%
A 95% detection rate does not mean that 95% of positive results are true positives. The base rate matters enormously.
The same calculation using the formula
Let D mean defective and + mean flagged. With prevalence P(D) = 0.01, detection probability P(+ | D) = 0.95, and false-positive rate P(+ | not D) = 0.10:
P(D | +) = (0.95 × 0.01) / [(0.95 × 0.01) + (0.10 × 0.99)]
= 0.0095 / 0.1085 ≈ 0.08756
The bracketed denominator is the law of total probability: it accounts for both true positives and false positives.
A reusable four-step method
- Identify the thing you want to know: P(hypothesis | evidence).
- Write the starting probability of that hypothesis, also called the prior.
- Calculate the chance of the evidence in every relevant group.
- Divide the joint probability of the hypothesis and evidence by the overall probability of the evidence.
Common traps in quant problems
- Reversing the condition: P(flagged | defective) and P(defective | flagged) are different quantities.
- Ignoring false positives: Even a low false-positive rate can dominate when the true event is rare.
- Using percentages without a common population: A table with 1,000 or 10,000 imagined cases can often make the calculation clearer than symbols alone.
Try it yourself
A fictional detector flags 80% of faulty components and 10% of healthy components. If 3% are faulty, what fraction of flagged components are faulty?
Reveal the worked answer
The chance of a true positive is 0.03 × 0.80 = 0.024. The false-positive chance is 0.97 × 0.10 = 0.097. Thus the answer is 0.024 / (0.024 + 0.097) = 24/121 ≈ 19.83%.
For the formal law of total probability and Bayes’ theorem, see OpenStax’s probability-theory chapter. These numbers are fictional teaching examples, not claims about any real medical test or product.